<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Lark &#187; Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedailylark.com/category/brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedailylark.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to the Daily Lark, the rants, ramblings and musings of Andy Lark - serial opinionator, mover and shaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Starbucks 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailylark.com/branding/starbucks-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailylark.com/branding/starbucks-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailylark.com/branding/starbucks-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a coffee fanatic. Anyone that calls for recommendations on New Zealand gets the A-List. And in the top 10 is any of the hot kiwi coffee houses &#8211; AllPress, Mecca, Atomic. There are too many to name. In the US though, it&#8217;s much more of a hit or miss affair. That&#8217;s why Starbucks remains [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a coffee fanatic. Anyone that calls for recommendations on New Zealand gets the A-List. And in the top 10 is any of the hot kiwi coffee houses &#8211; <a href="www.allpress.co.nz">AllPress</a>, Mecca, <a href="www.atomiccoffee.co.nz/">Atomic</a>. There are too many to name.</p>
<p>In the US though, it&#8217;s much more of a hit or miss affair. That&#8217;s why Starbucks remains attractive. Ok, the coffee isn&#8217;t off the charts great. But it&#8217;s so much better than the alternatives. And as a loyal customer, Howard Schultz seems to be doing a better job of getting it back into shape.</p>
<p>Their efforts to innovate &#8211; some of which are driven by listening to customers &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/merholz/2009/07/why-the-starbucks-15th-ave-sto.html">occasionally get hammered</a>. Take their new <a href="http://news.starbucks.com/news/fact+sheet+15th+ave+coffee+and+tea.htm">15th Ave Coffee &amp; Tea</a>. Call it healthy skepticism and cynicism. Or call it brand extremism. Really. </p>
<p>Why cant a corporation create a unique brand experience? &#8220;There&#8217;s no way a corporate coffee chain can create an authentic neighborhood coffeehouse experience&#8221; they say. Lets see. The idea they can&#8217;t is not more limiting than suggesting you need to be small do it.</p>
<p>Look at what Toyota did with Lexus. BMW with the mini. McDonalds with it&#8217;s coffee houses (invented in NZ). Honda with super light jets. Anheuser Busch with micro beers.</p>
<p>Ok &#8211; maybe those that regard themselves as &#8220;more authentically tuned&#8221; than the rest of us common folks will be repelled by these experiments. But for the mainstream they hold the potential to offer a refreshing and exciting alternative.</p>
<p>Often, attempts to improve the core of a business needs to start at the edge. In a new place. They shouldn&#8217;t be viewed as a diversion. One of the great things about achieving scale is the ability to innovate and experiment in ways a single proprietor business might not. And then to take that learning and use it to inform the core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailylark.com/branding/starbucks-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

