Andy on Twitter

  • Leonardo da Vinci's brilliance endures 500 years after his death ,
  • Embarrassed to be an American. Thrilled to be a Kiwi. It's not complete but a start. ,
  • Peeps, looking for a great agency/freelancer in Sydney with deep skills - build campaigns, edms etc in Pardot. Help!,
  • Disagree with this... myopic digital thinking. Miss by Kraft was underinvesting in brand and in some markets sellin… ,
  • Epic morning ,
  • Stunning Queenstown ,
  • Never gets old this view. Always changing with the light and seasons. ,
  • This is a maddening feature of Spotify and one of those moments of dissatisfaction that drives switching. Postal A… ,
  • A really good read... To often I see the value of data as a defensable advantage overstated... The Empty Promise of… ,
  • Brilliant... Choir! Choir! Choir! Epic! Nights: David Byrne + NYC sing HEROES via @YouTube,
  • Good move ... Westpac turns on AI chatbot ,
  • Paul is doing a great job of unpacking marketing trends and news. Worth a read if you are a marketer ,
  • Great read. Underscores how innovation happens in fast moving innovators is so radically different that incumbents.… ,
  • When landing in LAX and getting to terminal takes the equivalent of 70% of the flying time to LAX. Really… ,
  • The quality of questions matters... Good read... ,
  • Connect

Company Goes After Gartner…

Not sure if this has merit or not but its a pretty gutsy move – and if nothing else, burns the bridges once and for all with Gartner for ZL.

If nothing else, ZL’s case encapsulates the immense frustration so many have felt for so long with the entire MQ process. And, the smaller you are, the more heightened that frustration. Some interesting commentary here on the MQ process.

But I do think much of that frustration has to do with folks willingness to engage with Gartner and invest in AR. My view on the MQ has always been:

  • your position reflects both your expertise in influencing and the data you are willing to present
  • an open dialog and investment in that dialog works wonders. I’m not talking money here – I’m talking time and attention.
  • most of the Gartner analysts are pretty smart people. Whether you disagree or agree, it’s in your interests to listen, replay what you heard and show a willingness to at least incorporate some of their feedback. They are human. They like to be stroked.
  • it is less “pay-to-play” and more just “play”. Don’t make influencing Gartner be about a single briefing. You need a game-plan.
  • Gartner own the market. Get over it. This is an opportunity.

Are there things I wish Gartner would do differently – sure. For instance, I do think they should have an independent ombudsman. This would only boost perceptions of their integrity and allow a better process for fixing wrongs. Nobody is perfect.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee