Andy on Twitter

  • It’s funny how governments champion a surplus vs breakeven. How much does society miss out on as a result of a surp… ,
  • The roll-up continues, convienently slapping the CX label on it... Accenture Interactive buys Droga5, consultancy c… ,
  • Everything that is wrong with Apple exemplified in one move... total disregard for other users, ecosystems, our lib… ,
  • Loving Rich’s interview with Jack Dorsey. So many ideas and lessons in here. Worth a listen. Thanks ⁦@richroll⁩ ,
  • Am just amazed how bad receipt capture and processing apps are for SMBs. So primitive with poor functions and featu… ,
  • Trying to setup any product is enough to send anyone into the depths of despair. So bad. Why can’t everyone just use @google,
  • Hey, anyone got line of sight to a great contract or semi perm proposal writer in the US?,
  • Huge congrats to the Four Pillars gang. Amazing brand building and products are brilliant. Way to go. Beer giant Li… ,
  • And it so so hard for so many small businesses - tax policies and particular are just crazy ,
  • Whoever voted for this guy, please don’t do it again. Clearly has neither the intellect or sensitivity to lead. Ra… ,
  • Connect

Sponsorships Build Brands

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people say that sponsorships are a sink-hole for marketing dollars. They are wrong. This piece from Prophet shows what happens when you get it right with Red Bull as the case study. They make four observations:

  1. Red Bull’s brand building is largely based on associating its brand with an amazingly wide range of people, teams and events.
  2. Red Bull believes in owning teams and events rather than being one of several sponsors.
  3. Because of this ownership model, they can and have turned this buzz machine into a profit center.
  4. Their on-brand activities reflect two very different personalities that live side by side.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee