Andy on Twitter

  • Execsplaining the McSweeny’s “Business Words” – : The Next Generation ,
  • I see the highlanders are still sporting their awful hi-vis safety vest uniforms.,
  • The Machine Stops... ,
  • Reckon abandons battle with rivals MYOB, Xero... thinks it’s because ⁦@Xero⁩ throws money and marketing... ge… ,
  • Germany blocks Facebook from pooling user data without consent. So does this rule apply to every merger? Tough call… ,
  • The nonsense never ends ,
  • Interesting but Marketshare nailed this some years ago... Unilever Is Working on a Cross-Media Measurement Model to… ,
  • While I can’t stand the Super Bowl Ad Mania this move by Yellowtail is interesting in how they’ve got around ABs ca… ,
  • As many as 11,543 Microsoft employees got swept up in a reply-all email apocalypse ... that’s why it should have be… ,
  • Connect

FREEMIUM

Chris has a great response to The Economist on free models. I’ve long argued that free often gets misread as literally free. (the comments are worth reading)

Every customer comes with a cost. Rather than pay to market to you and obtain revenue now, instead I choose little or no marketing or distribution cost, focusing instead on the belief that you will pay for the product later. These freemium models are all round us. Google is doing it with Picasa. Flickr with FlickrPro.

There are those that also believe that, if you believe, you will pay. CC Cleaner is a great example. Terrific free utility for Windows. You pay to support the product if you think it is worth it. And its worth it. They are essentially monetizing a percent of their customer base that has a conscience or real enthusiasm for what they are doing.

Also worth a read is this survey of free business models online. More links here….

One Response

  1. By Freemium blog on April 7th, 2009 at 5:09 am

    I can only agree with you, the response by Chris Anderson is definately woth a look

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee